Financial Ratios and Sustainable Growth Rate Sample Essay

1. What are the three types of fiscal direction determinations? For each type of determination. give an illustration of a concern dealing that would be relevant.

Capital budgeting ( make up one’s minding whether to spread out a fabrication works ) . capital construction ( make up one’s minding whether to publish new equity and utilize the returns to retire outstanding debt ) . and working capital direction ( modifying the firm’s recognition aggregation policy with its clients ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

2. Measure the undermentioned statement: Directors should non concentrate on the current stock value because making so will take to an overemphasis on short-run net incomes at the disbursal of long-run net incomes.

Presumably. the current stock value reflects the hazard. timing. and magnitude of all future hard currency flows. both short-run and long-run. If this is right. so the statement is false.

3. Why might the gross and cost figures shown on a standard income statement non be representative of the existent hard currency influxs and escapes that occurred during a period?

The acknowledgment and fiting rules in fiscal accounting call for grosss. and the costs associated with bring forthing those grosss. to be “booked” when the gross procedure is basically complete. non needfully when the hard currency is collected or measures are paid. Note that this manner is non needfully correct ; it’s the manner comptrollers have chosen to make it.

4. Jetson Spacecraft Corp. shows the undermentioned information on its 2009 income statement: gross revenues $ 196. 000 ; costs $ 104. 000 ; other disbursals $ 6. 800 ; depreciation expense $ 9. 100 ; involvement expense $ 14. 800 ; revenue enhancements $ 21. 455 ; dividends $ 10. 400. In add-on. you’re told that the house issued $ 5. 700 in new equity during 2009 and redeemed $ 7. 300 in outstanding long-run debt.

a. What is the 2009 operating hard currency flow?

OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – Taxes = $ 76. 100 + 9. 100 – 21. 455 = $ 63. 745

B. What is the 2009 hard currency flow to creditors?

CFC = Interest – Net new LTD = $ 14. 800 – ( –7. 300 ) = $ 22. 100

c. What is the 2009 hard currency flow to shareholders?

CFS = Dividends – Net new equity = $ 10. 400 – 5. 700 = $ 4. 700

d. If net fixed assets increased by $ 27. 000 during the twelvemonth. what was the add-on to NWC?

We know that CFA = CFC + CFS. so:

CFA = $ 22. 100 + 4. 700 = $ 26. 800

CFA is besides equal to OCF – Net capital disbursement – Change in NWC. We already know OCF. Net capital disbursement is equal to:

Net capital disbursement = Increase in NFA + Depreciation = $ 27. 000 + 9. 100 = $ 36. 100

Now we can utilize:

CFA = OCF – Net capital disbursement – Change in NWC

$ 26. 800 = $ 63. 745 – 36. 100 – Change in NWC

Solving for the alteration in NWC gives $ 845. intending the company increased its NWC by $ 845.

5. Explain what it means for a house to hold a current ratio equal to. 50.
Would the house be better off if the current ratio were 1. 50? What if it were 15. 0? Explain your replies.

A current ratio of 0. 50 agencies that the house has twice every bit much in current liabilities as it does in current assets ; the house potentially has hapless liquidness. If pressed by its short-run creditors and providers for immediate payment. the house might hold a hard clip run intoing its duties. A current ratio of 1. 50 means the house has 50 % more current assets than it does current liabilities. This likely represents an betterment in liquidness ; short-run duties can by and large be met wholly with a safety factor built in. A current ratio of 15. 0. nevertheless. might be inordinate. Any extra financess sitting in current assets by and large earn small or no return. These extra financess might be put to better usage by puting in productive long-run assets or administering the financess to stockholders.

6. Y3K. Inc. . has gross revenues of $ 5. 276. entire assets of $ 3. 105. and a debt–equity ratio of 1. 40. If its return on equity is 15 per centum. what is its net income?

This is a multi-step job affecting several ratios. The ratios given are all portion of the DuPont Identity. The lone DuPont Identity ratio non given is the net income border. If we know the net income border. we can happen the net income since gross revenues are given. So. we begin with the DuPont Identity:

ROE = 0. 15 = ( PM ) ( TAT ) ( EM ) = ( PM ) ( S / TA ) ( 1 + D/E )

Solving the DuPont Identity for net income border. we get:

PM = [ ( ROE ) ( TA ) ] / [ ( 1 + D/E ) ( S ) ]

PM = [ ( 0. 15 ) ( $ 3. 105 ) ] / [ ( 1 + 1. 4 ) ( $ 5. 726 ) ] = . 0339

Now that we have the net income border. we can utilize this figure and the given gross revenues figure to work out for net income:

PM = . 0339 = NI / S

NI = . 0339 ( $ 5. 726 ) = $ 194. 06

7. In chapter 4. the book used Rosengarten Corporation to show how to cipher EFN. The ROE for Rosengarten is about 7. 3 per centum. and the plowback ratio is about 67 per centum. If you calculate the sustainable growing rate for Rosengarten. you will happen it is merely 5. 14 per centum. In the computation for EFN. a growing rate of 25 per centum was used. Is this possible? Explain.

Two premises of the sustainable growing expression are that the company does non desire to sell new equity. and that fiscal policy is fixed. If the company raises outside equity. or increases its debt-equity ratio it can turn at a higher rate than the sustainable growing rate. Of class the company could besides turn faster than its net income border additions. if it changes its dividend policy by increasing the keeping ratio. or its entire plus turnover additions.

8. Given the following informations and presuming no revenue enhancements. what is EFN?

| Income Statement | Balance Sheet | | Gross saless | $ 4. 900 | Assets | $ 11. 125 | Debt | $ 6. 927 | | Costss |3. 136 | | | Equity |4. 198 | | Net income | $ 1. 764 | Total | $ 11. 125 | Total | $ 11. 125 | | [ movie ] |

|Assets and costs are relative to gross revenues. Debt and equity are non. No dividends are paid. Following year’s gross revenues are projected to be $ 5. 880 | | | |An addition of gross revenues to $ 5. 880 is an addition of: | |Sales increase = ( $ 5. 880 – 4. 900 )
/ $ 4. 900 | |Sales increase = . 20 or 20 % |

|Assuming costs and assets increase proportionately. the pro forma fiscal statements will look like this: |

| Pro forma income statement |
| Gross saless | $ 5. 880 | | Costss |3. 763 | | Net income | $ 2. 117 |

| Pro forma balance sheet | | Assets | $ 13. 350 | Debt | $ 6. 927 | | | | Equity |6. 315 | | Total | $ 13. 350 | Total | $ 13. 242 | | [ movie ] |

|If no dividends are paid. the equity history will increase by the net income. so: | |Equity = $ 4. 198 + 2. 117 | |Equity = $ 6. 315 | |So the EFN is: | |EFN = Total assets – Total liabilities and equity | |EFN = $ 13. 350 – 13. 242 = $ 108 |

9. Based on the undermentioned information. cipher the sustainable growing rate
for Hendrix Guitars. Inc. :

Net income border 4. 8 %

Entire plus turnover 1. 25

Entire debt ratio. 65

Payout ratio 30 %

We should get down by ciphering the D/E ratio. We calculate the D/E ratio as follows:

Entire debt ratio = . 65 = TD / TA

Inverting both sides we get:

1 / . 65 = TA / TD

Following. we need to acknowledge that

TA / TD = 1 + TE / TD

Substituting this into the old equation. we get:

1 / . 65 = 1 + TE /TD

Subtract 1 ( one ) from both sides and inverting once more. we get:

D/E = 1 / [ ( 1 / . 65 ) – 1 ]
D/E = 1. 86

With the D/E ratio. we can cipher the EM and work out for ROE utilizing the DuPont individuality:

ROE = ( PM ) ( TAT ) ( EM )
ROE = ( . 048 ) ( 1. 25 ) ( 1 + 1. 86 )
ROE = . 1714 or 17. 14 %

Now we can cipher the keeping ratio as:

B = 1 – . 30
B = . 70

Finally. seting all the Numberss we have calculated into the sustainable growing rate equation. we get:

Sustainable growing rate = ( ROE ? B ) / [ 1 – ( ROE ? B ) ]
Sustainable growing rate = [ . 1714 ( . 70 ) ] / [ 1 – . 1714 ( . 70 ) ]
Sustainable growing rate = . 1364 or 13. 64 %

10. Businesss sometimes advertise that you should. “Come try our merchandise. If you do. we’ll give you $ 100 merely for coming by! ” If you read the all right print. what you find out is that they will give you a nest eggs certification that will pay you $ 100 in 25 old ages or so. Is it delusory advertisement? Is it unethical to publicize a future value like this without a disclaimer?

It would look to be both delusory and unethical to run such an ad without a disclaimer or account.

11. You are scheduled to have $ 20. 000 in two old ages. When you receive it. you will put it for six more old ages at 8. 4 per centum per twelvemonth. How much will you hold in eight old ages?

We need to happen the FV of a ball amount. However. the money will merely be invested for six old ages. so the figure of periods is six.

FV = PV ( 1 + R ) T
FV = $ 20. 000 ( 1. 084 ) 6 = $ 32. 449. 33

12. Should impart Torahs be changed to necessitate loaners to describe EARs alternatively of APRs? Why or why non? Yes. they should. APRs by and large don’t supply the relevant rate. The lone advantage is that they are easier to calculate. but. with modern calculating equipment. that advantage is non really of import.

13. A local finance company quotes a 16 percent involvement rate on one- twelvemonth loans. So. if you borrow $ 25. 000. the involvement for the twelvemonth will be $ 4. 000. Because you must refund a sum of $ 29. 000 in one twelvemonth. the finance company requires you to pay $ 29. 000/ 12. or $ 2. 416. 67. per month over the following 12 months. Is this a 16 per centum loan? What rate would lawfully hold to be quoted? What is the effectual one-year rate?

To happen the APR and EAR. we need to utilize the existent hard currency flows of the loan. In other words. the involvement rate quoted in the job is merely relevant to find the entire involvement under the footings given. The involvement rate for the hard currency flows of the loan is:

PVA = $ 25. 000 = $ 2. 416. 67 { ( 1 – [ 1 / ( 1 + R ) ] 12 ) / R }

Again. we can non work out this equation for r. so we need to work out this equation on a fiscal reckoner. utilizing a spreadsheet. or by test and mistake. Using a spreadsheet. we find:

R = 2. 361 % per month

So the APR is:

APR = 12 ( 2. 361 % ) = 28. 33 %

And the EAR is:

Ear = ( 1. 02361 ) 12 – 1 = . 3231 or 32. 31 %

14. What is the value of an investing that pays $ 15. 000 every other twelvemonth
everlastingly. if the first payment occurs one twelvemonth from today and the price reduction rate is 10 per centum compounded daily?

The hard currency flows in this job occur every two old ages. so we need to happen the effectual two twelvemonth rate. One manner to happen the effectual two twelvemonth rate is to utilize an equation similar to the EAR. except use the figure of yearss in two old ages as the advocate. ( We use the figure of yearss in two old ages since it is day-to-day intensifying ; if monthly combination was assumed. we would utilize the figure of months in two years. ) So. the effectual biennial involvement rate is:

Effective 2-year rate = [ 1 + ( . 10/365 ) ] 365 ( 2 ) – 1 = . 2214 or 22. 14 %

We can utilize this involvement rate to happen the PV of the sempiternity. Making so. we find:

PV = $ 15. 000 / . 2214 = $ 67. 760. 07

This is an of import point: Remember that the PV equation for a sempiternity ( and an ordinary rente ) tells you the PV one period before the first hard currency flow. In this job. since the hard currency flows are two old ages apart. we have found the value of the sempiternity one period ( two old ages ) before the first payment. which is one twelvemonth ago. We need to intensify this value for one twelvemonth to happen the value today. The value of the hard currency flows today is:

PV = $ 67. 760. 07 ( 1 + . 10/365 ) 365 = $ 74. 885. 44

15. A company is contemplating a long-run bond issue. It is debating whether to include a call proviso. What are the benefits to the company from including a call proviso? What are the costs?

There are two benefits. First. the company can take advantage of involvement rate diminutions by naming in an issue and replacing it with a lower voucher issue. Second. a company might wish to extinguish a compact for some ground. Naming the issue does this. The cost to the company is a higher voucher. A put proviso is desirable from an investor’s point of view. so it helps the company by cut downing the voucher rate on the bond. The cost to the company is that it may hold to purchase back the bond at an unattractive monetary value.

16. Both Bond Sam and Bond Dave have 9 percent vouchers. make biannual payments. and are priced at par value. Bond Sam has 3 old ages to adulthood. whereas Bond Dave has 20 old ages to adulthood. If involvement rates all of a sudden rise by 2 per centum. what is the per centum alteration in the monetary value of Bond Sam? Of Bond Dave?

Any bond that sells at par has a YTM equal to the voucher rate. Both bonds sell at par. so the initial YTM on both bonds is the voucher rate. 9 per centum. If the YTM all of a sudden rises to 11 per centum:

PSam = $ 45 ( PVIFA5. 5 % . 6 ) + $ 1. 000 ( PVIF5. 5 % . 6 ) = $ 950. 04

PDave = $ 45 ( PVIFA5. 5 % . 40 ) + $ 1. 000 ( PVIF5. 5 % . 40 ) = $ 839. 54

The per centum alteration in monetary value is calculated as:

Percentage alteration in monetary value = ( New monetary value – Original monetary value ) / Original monetary value

( PSam % = ( $ 950. 04 – 1. 000 ) / $ 1. 000 = – 5. 00 %

( PDave % = ( $ 839. 54 – 1. 000 ) / $ 1. 000 = – 16. 05 %

17. A significant per centum of the companies listed on the NYSE and NASDAQ don’t pay dividends. but investors are however willing to purchase portions in them. Under what fortunes might a company choose non to pay dividends?

In general. companies that need the hard currency will frequently waive dividends since dividends are a hard currency disbursal. Young. turning companies with profitable investing chances are one illustration ; another illustration is a company in fiscal hurt. This inquiry is examined in deepness in a ulterior chapter.

18. Storico Co. merely paid a dividend of $ 2. 45 per portion. The company will increase its dividend by 20 per centum following twelvemonth and will so cut down its dividend growing rate by 5 per centum points per twelvemonth until it reaches the industry norm of 5 percent dividend growing. after which the company will maintain a changeless growing rate forever. If the needed return on Storico stock is 11 per centum. what will a portion of stock sell for today?

Here we have a stock with supranormal growing. but the dividend growing alterations every twelvemonth for the first four old ages. We can happen the monetary value of the stock in Year 3 since the dividend growing rate is changeless after the 3rd dividend. The monetary value of the stock in Year 3 will be the dividend in Year 4. divided by the needed return minus the changeless dividend growing rate. So. the monetary value in Year 3 will be:

P3 = $ 2. 45 ( 1. 20 ) ( 1. 15 ) ( 1. 10 ) ( 1. 05 ) / ( . 11 – . 05 ) = $ 65. 08

The monetary value of the stock today will be the PV of the first three dividends. plus the PV of the stock monetary value in Year 3. so:

P0 = $ 2. 45 ( 1. 20 ) / ( 1. 11 ) + $ 2. 45 ( 1. 20 ) ( 1. 15 ) /1. 112 + $ 2. 45 ( 1. 20 ) ( 1. 15 ) ( 1. 10 ) /1. 113 + $ 65. 08/1. 113 P0 = $ 55. 70

19. What is the relationship between IRR and NPV? Are at that place any state of affairss in which you might prefer one method over the other? Explain. IRR is the involvement rate that causes NPV for a series of hard currency flows to be zero. NPV is preferred in all state of affairss to IRR ; IRR can take to equivocal consequences if there are non-conventional hard currency flows. and it besides equivocally ranks some reciprocally sole undertakings. However. for stand-alone undertakings with conventional hard currency flows. IRR and NPV are interchangeable techniques.

20. An investing under consideration has a payback of seven old ages and a cost of $ 724. 000. If the needed return is 12 per centum. what is the worst-case NPV? The best-case NPV? Explain. Assume the hard currency flows are conventional.

Given the seven twelvemonth payback. the worst instance is that the payback occurs at the terminal of the 7th twelvemonth. Thus. the worst-case:

NPV = – $ 724. 000 + $ 724. 000/1. 127 = – $ 396. 499. 17

The best instance has infinite hard currency flows beyond the payback point. Therefore. the best-case NPV is infinite.