Organizational Behaviour Case Analysis Sample Essay

In the instance ‘Leading Change at Simmons’ . the cardinal issue for Simmons Company is whether or non it should travel in front with Eitel’s proposed thought of a civilization alteration plan which would be $ 7. 2 million at a clip where the company is encompassed in a myriad of jobs and terrible economic crises’ . The plan has had initial success but its hereafter profitableness still remains mostly unsure due to high degrees of emphasis and opposition to alter found amongst the company’s employees.

Analysis and Evaluation
Simmons is a well-established. trademark manufacturer of bed mattresses but the company’s organisational construction is non in line with its published set of cultural values of ‘CHOICES’ . that promote a friendly. engaging and rewarding system for the employees. The bulk of the many workss owned by Simmons operate as a type of monarchy with the general director perceived as the dictator enforcing his/her ain regulations and ordinances without any respect for the working employees. This creates high emphasis degrees among the workers due to changeless work force per unit areas from their leaders and an unfavourable work environment with rigorous regulations created to keep operational subject ( such as a sergeant walking the waies of workss as if on patrol ) . The workss besides compete with each other instead than join forcesing with small or no information being shared among different workss. These hinderance stressors debilitate the workers’ morale and deeply affect productiveness.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Eitel signifiers a scheme to alter this civilization of absolutism in most workss and transfuse a on the job environment similar to the company’s Janesville works which produces the highest gross of $ 150 million out of the entire $ 900 million due to a friendly and stimulating civilization of work where the employees are given wagess for public presentation and have a say in major determinations.

From the really beginning of his term of office. Eitel stimulates a civilization of invention by advancing a new. redesigned version of the beauty remainder mattress by utilizing a $ 9 million ad run. which fetches an increased 25 % of gross revenues for the company. He besides fires 14 people in the executive ranks at a cost of $ 3. 8 million to centralise the company and maintain long term of office in the direction in order to guarantee legitimacy and cognition of how to obtain coveted results. These stairss are aimed to equalise power and better trust and support among the work force. which should take to organisational development.

Eitel’s chief scheme is based on a plan called the Great Game Of Life. The purpose is to enable employees to excel self-imposed bounds and let better coherence among squads by go throughing them through assorted. tickle pinking physical undertakings. His plan is in conformance with the regulations of Lewin’s Three-Step Model to some extent. as the leaders of the company take up the undertakings foremost. Eitel’s chief purpose by this is to dissolve the position quo and cut down the restraining forces. which are the chief hindrance to alter. Although the executive direction acknowledges the program’s effectivity. it doesn’t agree for it to be passed on the work force due to a high opposition to alter. They perceive it as a possible menace to established power relationships because of current structural and group inactiveness within the organisation. The direction executives are accustomed to micromanaging in a dictatorial manner and feel threatened by the possibility of alteration so both factors of wonts and security as single beginnings of opposition come in to play here. Group inactiveness and menace to expertness are besides exhibited when the executives dismiss the plan in unison. terming it to be uneffective despite any concrete grounds endorsing their claims.

Recommendations
It is clear that there is still high opposition to alter among the workers at Simmons. Eitel’s actions are well-versed and headed in the right way as the Great Game Strategy produces extremist and positive consequences when it is implemented in the highly unintegrated Charlotte works. However. he still falls short on developing positive relationships among the executive commission as he goes on with his scheme without their blessing which creates hurt and consequences in a twosome of surrenders by the directors every bit good.

To get the better of this opposition to alter. it is indispensable that Eitel organize positive relationships with his workers along with good support and committedness. He could make this by promoting better communicating in the company and educating the direction about his program by pass oning the logic of his proposed alterations. If the employees see the full facts and work out the misinterpretations. opposition should lessen. This can be done by leting the employees to develop and organize the programs to present alterations with him which would let for enhanced engagement and credence of the alteration as the employees would hold a sense of ownership in the alteration made which will do it much easier for them to conform one time everyone is on board for the determination. Eitel should besides do certain that all alterations are just to everyone and make non come of as being biased which could make disagreements among the workers.

Other than that. he should concentrate on activities such as intergroup development. which seeks to alter the groups’ attitudes. stereotypes and perceptual experiences about each other through preparation Sessionss. which focus on differences among businesss. sections. or divisions within an organisation. Interpersonal dealingss. end scene and squad edifice activities should besides be carried out to make trust and openness among the squad members. Opinion polls such as the study feedback could besides be carried out to expose the covert side of opposition to alter among employees and so actions to better coherence could be taken consequently.

If there is strong opposition from certain employees he should replace them with people who are more susceptible to alter. as there is a immense difference in personalities of different people due to external or internal factors.

As his plan has radically turned around production and employee attitude at the Charlotte works. I think the company should continue with the plan as it has all positive consequences till now and could let for greater net incomes and occupation satisfaction. similar to the alteration in the Charlotte works.

One leader I think would hold improved the state of affairs at Simmons would be the cricketer-turned politician. Imran Khan. Imran is a recognized and well-reputed leader by everyone around the universe due to his many achievements when put in the place of power. When he was the captain of the Pakistan cricket squad. he wholly changed the mentality of the squad. The squad was down and out in the 1992 universe cup when he provided the participants with inspiration and allowed for integrity and coherence. which incredibly lead the squad to triumph.

Similarly he is the proprietor of the world’s largest private malignant neoplastic disease infirmary and a new university metropolis. which are both funded by charity. He is besides the president of Pakistan’s popular and fast-rising political party ( PTI ) . which is considered to be a major rival for the following elections. These accomplishments along with a sense of equality and justness for all make him an ideal campaigner for such a place as he is able to further and unify even the most spread of crowds and would hold worked along the lines of these recommendations if he was in topographic point of Eitel.